The mystery of Creation
The big life question, who created us and the world. Many believe Darwin's evolution theory and it is integrated in our schools and learning programs but it is true and proven?
Should we believe this theory? I believe not. Just to clarify, this theory says we cannot evolve from a monkey. This is not what this theory learns. It explains that we humans and monkeys evolved from a common apelike ancestor.
Now evolution exist and is scientific proven that is no debate, but what is evolution?
1- Microevolution is scientific true: The Labrador, Chihuahua, Pitbul all evolved from one ancestor Dog.
2- Genetic mutation is scientific true: From the superior Wolf evolved lesser genes as the Fox, Coyotes and Dogs, so less strong evolution and it's also a part Microevolution.
3- Macroevolution is not scientific and has never been proven and this theory is what is contradictory. This theory explains that a Reptile can evolve in a Bird.
Macroevolution is an important concept because Darwinists believe that it is the mechanism for their idea that all life evolved from a common primordial ancestor. Since microevolution is small-scale ("micro") biological change, and macroevolution is large-scale ("macro") biological change, many Darwinists argue that macroevolution is simply the accumulation of microevolutionary changes over time.
However, because macroevolution requires new additional genetic information, no amount of rearrangement, corruption or loss of existing genetic information will produce macroevolution. In other words, no amount of microevolution will produce macroevolution.
The reason why macroevolution is controversial and remains theoretical is that there is no known way for entirely new genetic information to be added to a genome. Darwinists have been hoping that genetic mutation would provide a mechanism, but so far that has not been the case. As Dr. Spetner again explains, "I really do not believe that the neo-Darwinian model can account for large-scale evolution. What they really can't account for is the buildup of information. ...And not only is it improbable on the mathematical level, that is, theoretically, but experimentally one has not found a single mutation that one can point at that actually adds information. In fact, every beneficial mutation that I have seen reduces the information, it loses information.
So this means if we had a common apelike ancestor, this ancestor evolved a lesser species and a superior species and this is impossible.
Unlike microevolution, there is no true scientific evidence for macroevolution, and, in fact, there is significant evidence against it. The distinction between microevolution and macroevolution is, therefore, an important one for those interested in the creation vs. evolution debate.
So i believe that God the Father and Our Lord Jesus Christ created the world and us.
They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator who is forever praised. Amen.
Thus saith God the Lord, he that created the heavens, and stretched them out, he that spread forth the earth and that which cometh out of it, he that giveth breath unto the people upon it and spirit to them that walk therein
For thus saith the Lord that created the heavens, God himself that formed the earth and made it, he hath established it, he created it not in vain, he formed it to be inhabited: I am the LORD, and there is none else.
Thou art worthy, O Lord, to receive glory and honour and power: for thou hast created all things, and for thy pleasure they are and were created
I am no scientist and support science but if it comes to this subject i believe the Bible and God the Father and Our Lord Jesus Christ.